You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am confused. The text file in the source code indicates that this
software is licensed under the LGPL, but comments in the actual Java source
code seem to indicate that it is licensed under the straight GPL.
Which is it? And if you indicate that it is the LGPL, is that not a
violation of the GPL, since it seems that you have (perhaps inadvertantly)
published the Java source under the GPL?
Original issue reported on code.google.com by jsnyde...@yahoo.com on 27 May 2009 at 2:47
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Any idea when it will be finalized as LGPL? It's been already two months since
your
last comment but as of today in the code checked out from the read-only
repository
all files contain reference to GPL instead of LGPL...
Original comment by adg...@gmail.com on 4 Aug 2009 at 6:35
The licensing ambiguity is also a problem for me. I can provide a patch to the
Java
source to change the license to LGPL if that would speed things up.
Original comment by danduke...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2009 at 3:53
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jsnyde...@yahoo.com
on 27 May 2009 at 2:47The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: