Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

⚠️ CI failed ⚠️ #202

Closed
github-actions bot opened this issue Jul 4, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

⚠️ CI failed ⚠️ #202

github-actions bot opened this issue Jul 4, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
@ncclementi
Labels
cause: platform Platform issue (i.e. Coiled specific) cause: upstream (dask) Upstream Dask issue (e.g. API breakage) ci-failure duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2022

Workflow Run URL
@ncclementi
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate of #166

@ncclementi ncclementi marked this as a duplicate of #166 Jul 5, 2022
@ian-r-rose
Copy link
Contributor

Should we xfail that test for the time being?

@ncclementi
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, I'm starting to think that we should. Since this PR is not ready yet dask/distributed#6637 . I'll open a PR to skip , since the failure is a bit flaky.

@ncclementi ncclementi self-assigned this Jul 5, 2022
@fjetter fjetter added duplicate This issue or pull request already exists ci-failure cause: upstream (dask) Upstream Dask issue (e.g. API breakage) cause: platform Platform issue (i.e. Coiled specific) labels Aug 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ncclementi ncclementi

Labels
cause: platform Platform issue (i.e. Coiled specific) cause: upstream (dask) Upstream Dask issue (e.g. API breakage) ci-failure duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ian-r-rose @ncclementi @fjetter