Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue/PR review help and Roadmap #1646

Closed
maxArturo opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Issue/PR review help and Roadmap #1646

maxArturo opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
management Library Management stale No activity in last 60 days

Comments

@maxArturo
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @colinhacks! Like many other folks, I'm really happy with zod's no nonsense approach (I chafed one too many people with io-ts in the past). It's become a fun package I plan on spending more time helping on, and it seems that's the case for others too based on the number of PRs.

With that said, some of the issues are pretty old (with the oldest one at around ~2 yrs). Also some issues aren't truly "stale" and the stalebot seems a bit aggressive. I realize this isn't that bad for a 14k repo - but I'm sure you are quite busy, so I'm wondering if there's a place where the community can get a sense of where you need help the most, or what your feature roadmap is? I took a look but couldn't find one readily available.

I started poking around at the oldest issues and encouraging folks to triage/self-report the still valid ones. However, I suppose you will want to at some point start saying "yea or nay" to some recurring themes along with ideas on implementation (i8n, etc).

Perhaps you are already doing this, but do you have other trusted collaborators with issue triage/PR review/merge privileges? Otherwise it'd be great to give people some heads-up that the turnaround time might be longer than they expect.

My whole thrust is to help you help us! A good turnaround on PR review and issue closure keeps the package healthy and makes newcomers (like myself) eager to contribute. Not to mention that it develops a sense of commitment to quality and shared ownership. Would love to hear your thoughts. Thanks again for this great tool!

@JacobWeisenburger JacobWeisenburger added the management Library Management label Jan 3, 2023
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 3, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale No activity in last 60 days label Apr 3, 2023
@stale stale bot closed this as completed May 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
management Library Management stale No activity in last 60 days
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants