Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[package] ninja/1.9.0: Need to be built by GCC 4.9 #1327

Closed
uilianries opened this issue Apr 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

[package] ninja/1.9.0: Need to be built by GCC 4.9 #1327

uilianries opened this issue Apr 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@uilianries
Copy link
Member

Ninja package is an installer and is built and distributed using GCC 5 as the compiler setting is removed from its package id. The problem occurs when a package requires Ninja as build requirement, but needs to be build by GCC 4.9.

The glibc version from Trusty (GCC 4.9) is incompatible to Xenial (GCC 5), which results is linkage error.

We need to find some way to detect when a package is an installer and build using GCC 4.9 to keep the backward compatibility.

/cc @danimtb @solvingj

Package and Environment Details (include every applicable attribute)

  • Package Name/Version: ninja/1.9.0
  • Operating System+version: Linux Ubuntu 18.04
  • Compiler+version: GCC 5
  • Docker image: conanio/gcc5
  • Conan version: conan 1.24.0
  • Python version: Python 3.8

Conan profile (output of conan profile show default or conan profile show <profile> if custom profile is in use)

[settings]
os=Linux
os_build=Linux
arch=x86_64
arch_build=x86_64
compiler=gcc
compiler.version=4.9
compiler.libcxx=libstdc++
build_type=Release
[options]
[build_requires]
[env]

Steps to reproduce (Include if Applicable)

Build the PR #1325

Logs (Include/Attach if Applicable)

Check the PR #1325 logs

@uilianries uilianries added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 9, 2020
@ericLemanissier
Copy link
Contributor

continuation of #624 and #213

@uilianries
Copy link
Member Author

fixed by #2062

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants