You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some recipes utilise intrinsics such as SSE and AVX. Enabling these intrinsics greatly improves the speed of many applications. However, most applications do not guard against a particular intrinsic not existing at run time and will simply crash if the architecture it is run on does not support a given instruction.
For example, OpenCV supports up to SSE 4.1 instructions - yet it is feasible that someone may download OpenCV on an older Linux box that does not support SSE 4.1. Therefore, I imagine we want to do something like the proposal in #80 whereby we have features for different SSE levels - where supported?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a good idea. However, I'm trying to get these various concerns addressed in this issue ( conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io#49 ). So, closing as a dup so that we can keep the discussion in one place.
Some recipes utilise intrinsics such as SSE and AVX. Enabling these intrinsics greatly improves the speed of many applications. However, most applications do not guard against a particular intrinsic not existing at run time and will simply crash if the architecture it is run on does not support a given instruction.
For example, OpenCV supports up to SSE 4.1 instructions - yet it is feasible that someone may download OpenCV on an older Linux box that does not support SSE 4.1. Therefore, I imagine we want to do something like the proposal in #80 whereby we have features for different SSE levels - where supported?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: