You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi conda-lock team, congrats on getting v1.0 shipped! A load of really great improvements we'll be adopting in our workflow.
I like the idea of platform addition to the environment.yml file. It keeps the environment definition simple and in one place. However, I am a little concerned with the lack of standardisation of the environment.yml format - have you managed to have any conversations with the core conda dev team about this? There is also an open issue conda/conda#10916 for formalising custom user-metadata additions to environment.yml, but so far this not received any interest from the core conda dev team.
It would be great if conda-lock could push forward the standardisation of the conda environment specification. e.g. could we look to get the new conda-lock keywords added to the documentation on conda.io?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am a little concerned with the lack of standardisation of the environment.yml format
Just wanted to highlight this concern. conda-lock has been wonderful and the unified lockfile is really great for sharing cross-platform environments in a single file, but it's frustrating to have to keep rendering the older platform-specific files. Seems like a standard format these various tools could consume would be a great convenience. Specifically: conda create -f conda-lock.yml (or mamba create for that matter) would just work mamba-org/mamba#1884
Hi conda-lock team, congrats on getting v1.0 shipped! A load of really great improvements we'll be adopting in our workflow.
I like the idea of
platform
addition to the environment.yml file. It keeps the environment definition simple and in one place. However, I am a little concerned with the lack of standardisation of the environment.yml format - have you managed to have any conversations with the core conda dev team about this? There is also an open issue conda/conda#10916 for formalising custom user-metadata additions to environment.yml, but so far this not received any interest from the core conda dev team.It would be great if conda-lock could push forward the standardisation of the conda environment specification. e.g. could we look to get the new conda-lock keywords added to the documentation on conda.io?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: