You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently in federated validation, we still need to bootstrap the subnet, this means that a minimum number of validators would have to put some collateral in the subnet to bootstrap the subnet in order for the federated validation to kick in, and the owner to be able to start setting the federated power of validators.
I think this is not the way we want it to work. If we choose a Federated subnet, the operator should be able to pass an initial membership and spawn the subnet already bootstrapped without having to send any collateral.
Also, we should introduce a new type of permissioning called Static which would be equivalent to what we currently have in Mycelium, where we allow any validator to join through collateral until the subnet is bootstrapped, point from which no new validators will be accepted.
Currently in federated validation, we still need to bootstrap the subnet, this means that a minimum number of validators would have to put some collateral in the subnet to bootstrap the subnet in order for the federated validation to kick in, and the owner to be able to start setting the federated power of validators.
I think this is not the way we want it to work. If we choose a
Federated
subnet, the operator should be able to pass an initial membership and spawn the subnet already bootstrapped without having to send any collateral.Also, we should introduce a new type of permissioning called
Static
which would be equivalent to what we currently have in Mycelium, where we allow any validator to join through collateral until the subnet is bootstrapped, point from which no new validators will be accepted.//cc @maciejwitowski @raulk @cryptoAtwill
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: