-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
need investigate: cross test
failed with exit code 0
#685
Comments
I spent some time on this. I believe that the root cause may actually be an open issue with buildx: docker/buildx#732 |
What would you suggest as a walkaround? @fawadasaurus |
Github now offers ARM64 (in addition to AMD64) runners for Windows and Linux. So would it be viable to use a matrix of different runners for builds / tests? I am curious if using the native runner for each build/test is a viable alternative to Cross and meets the needs that originally led to using Cross. What do you think @Mossaka ? |
I think one of the goals to use cross is that we want to build statically-linked binaries. But I agree with you that we may investigate native runners for each build/test. Jorge had a PR #737 that fixed this issue. |
We currently do not run the tests in arm64, using native runners would be interesting if it allows us to run them. The reason not to run them in arm64 is because cross uses qemu to run the tests when the arch doesn't match, and that didn't translate properly to the syscalls we use to create the containers. Using native runners would fix that. |
run: https://github.com/containerd/runwasi/actions/runs/11112905312/job/30876017101?pr=682#step:9:373
Originally posted by @Mossaka in #682 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: