Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow for custom location of home directory on the host #887

Closed
JayDoubleu opened this issue Sep 27, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Allow for custom location of home directory on the host #887

JayDoubleu opened this issue Sep 27, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
1. Feature request A request for a new feature

Comments

@JayDoubleu
Copy link

Currently toolbox will default to your home directory. Because of this I cannot use toolbox for other purposes (isolated, work projects etc). I love the automatic integration with X as well as automatically mounting /dev for me however I believe having option to specify custom $HOME path for container would be a very useful feature.

I would like to be able to specify custom $HOME path for each toolbox container on the host so that there is no conflicting config files for cloud environments such as Azure or AWS, python modules etc. Ideally if we would have something like .toolboxrc file in which we could define custom configurations for tagged containers and allow tagging when using toolbox create command?.

I am aware that I could create podman containers with CMDlines from toolbox however I believe it would be more convenient to have this functionality within toolbox itself.

@JayDoubleu JayDoubleu added the 1. Feature request A request for a new feature label Sep 27, 2021
@juhp
Copy link
Contributor

juhp commented Oct 15, 2021

You could try looking at podenv, though it is a more general tool than toolbox.
I do have a copr repo if you are on Fedora.

@JayDoubleu
Copy link
Author

Wow ! I didn't know it existed, looks exactly like what I've been looking for. Going to try it out. Thanks !

@debarshiray
Copy link
Member

Yes, this keeps coming up from time to time.

Unfortunately, I am afraid that it's not very high on our list of priorities at the moment.

@debarshiray
Copy link
Member

Duplicate of #183

@debarshiray debarshiray marked this as a duplicate of #183 Nov 15, 2021
@debarshiray debarshiray reopened this Aug 5, 2022
@debarshiray debarshiray closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1. Feature request A request for a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants