Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use more inclusive language in README.md {guys => folks} #1640

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2017
Merged

Use more inclusive language in README.md {guys => folks} #1640

merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2017

Conversation

igorwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
Copy link
Contributor

@igorwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww igorwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww commented May 20, 2017 •
edited by ldez
Loading

Description

While usage of the word "guys" can be considered gender neutral depending on location and context, it is widely considered to be gendered -- and more inclusive options are readily available. 💜

References:

@ldez ldez added area/documentation kind/enhancement a new or improved feature. labels May 20, 2017
@emilevauge
Copy link
Member

emilevauge commented May 20, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Thanks guy ;)

emilevauge
emilevauge approved these changes May 22, 2017
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@emilevauge emilevauge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ldez ldez added this to the 1.4 milestone May 22, 2017
@igorwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww @ldez
Use more inclusive language in README.md {guys => folks}
406ad20 
While usage of the word "guys" can be considered gender neutral depending on location and context, it is widely considered to be gendered -- and more inclusive options are readily available. 💜

References:

* [When is "guys" gender neutral? I did a survey! -- Julia Evans](https://jvns.ca/blog/2013/12/27/guys-guys-guys/)
@ldez ldez merged commit 2643271 into traefik:master May 22, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@timoreimann timoreimann timoreimann approved these changes

@emilevauge emilevauge emilevauge approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/documentation kind/enhancement a new or improved feature.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.4
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@igorwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww @emilevauge @timoreimann @ldez