Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add all available labels to Docker Backend #2584

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Dec 20, 2017

Conversation

ldez
Copy link
Contributor

@ldez ldez commented Dec 18, 2017

What does this PR do?

  • add all available labels (container and services)
    • add passTLSCert label.
    • add HealthCheck labels.
    • add error pages labels.
    • add rate limit labels.
    • add whitelistSourceRange for services
  • enhance template readability
  • enhance template method readability

Motivation

Homogenization of the providers [part2]: all providers must have the same options available.

More

  • Added/updated tests
  • Added/updated documentation

Additional Notes

Several PRs will come after that for each provider.

Fixes #2277, #1286, #2535, #1910

Related to #618, #1465

@ldez ldez added kind/enhancement a new or improved feature. status/2-needs-review labels Dec 18, 2017
@ldez ldez added this to the 1.6 milestone Dec 18, 2017
@ldez ldez requested a review from a team as a code owner December 18, 2017 10:09
@ldez ldez force-pushed the refactor/labels-docker branch 6 times, most recently from 5398a75 to 9e31e39 Compare December 19, 2017 13:13
@mmatur mmatur changed the title homogenization of the providers [part2]: Docker Homogenization of the providers [part2]: Docker Dec 19, 2017
Copy link
Member

@mmatur mmatur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ldez ldez changed the title Homogenization of the providers [part2]: Docker Add all available labels to Docker Backend Dec 19, 2017
@ldez ldez force-pushed the refactor/labels-docker branch 3 times, most recently from cf0ec1f to 55bafd2 Compare December 19, 2017 23:53
Copy link
Member

@juliens juliens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@nmengin nmengin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🤖

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants