Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify DuckDNS does not support multiple TXT records #4061

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2018

Conversation

KnicKnic
Copy link
Contributor

@KnicKnic KnicKnic commented Oct 17, 2018

What does this PR do?

Clarifies that DuckDNS dns solver does not support wild card & root support, specifically because that requires multiple txt records, and duckdns only supports 1.
See http://duckdns.org/spec.jsp for more information.

Motivation

To Inform others

More

  • Added/updated documentation

Additional Notes

Copy link
Contributor

@nmengin nmengin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👏 👏 📖

@ldez ldez changed the base branch from master to v1.7 October 17, 2018 14:39
Copy link
Contributor

@ldez ldez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@dtomcej dtomcej left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
:shipit:

Copy link
Member

@juliens juliens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@traefiker traefiker merged commit 37d8e32 into traefik:v1.7 Oct 18, 2018
@ldez ldez changed the title clarify DuckDNS does not support multiple TXT records Clarify DuckDNS does not support multiple TXT records Oct 30, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants