Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Address 0x29 is not always valid #5

Open
eupn opened this issue Jan 6, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Address 0x29 is not always valid #5

eupn opened this issue Jan 6, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@eupn
Copy link

eupn commented Jan 6, 2020

I can see how it can be valid for a 7-bit address I2C controller. But for some chips, for example, STM32WB55xx or probably the chip in #4, the 0x52 address from the datasheet is actually the valid one.

I have confirmed on my board that 0x52 is working and 0x29 is not. We should be able to specify the address used.
@bofh
Copy link
Member

bofh commented Jan 11, 2020

Thank you, that’s probably the reason for #4.

@bofh bofh mentioned this issue Jan 13, 2020
Closed
@bofh
Copy link
Member

bofh commented Jan 22, 2020

rust-embedded/embedded-hal#147

@bofh
Copy link
Member

bofh commented Jan 6, 2024

We should take a look at rust-embedded/embedded-hal#230

@bofh
Copy link
Member

bofh commented Jan 10, 2024

Wondering if #10 would help

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bofh @eupn