Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature request] Support operation with assuming function extensionality #2

Open
RalfJung opened this issue Jan 30, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@RalfJung
Copy link
Collaborator

Right now, function extensionality as pulled in by asimpl is the only axiom we use in our entire Coq development.

Considering that this is ultimately about proving equality of source terms, which have decidable equality, function extensionality should not be necessary here. It would be nice if the axiom could be avoided :)

@tebbi
Copy link
Collaborator

tebbi commented Feb 3, 2016

Thank you for the suggestion!

I am currently re-designing Autosubst from scratch, so it does not make much sense to implement this feature in a soon to be dead branch. Apart from that, yes, I plan to do this, but since it complicates matters, only once I am fully convinced of the design.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants