-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 496
High risk removed from contact journal #5031
Comments
|
Thanks. I looked for the first one, but in the wrong repositories.😉 |
I used the search field in the top left of GitHub and typed |
I can't reproduce this issue, High risk is not removed from contact diary after 11 days, please provide error log if you can re-produce it ? risk.mp4 |
@mlenkeit Did the device perform a new risk check on 23/09/2022 (i.e. do you still see the red encounter on the "Status" tab or only the failed card)? |
@Ein-Tim I think you mean me.It did not. I see failed risk card. do you think future calculations matter in this occasion?. as far as I know when high risk is reported from ENS or ChecksIns it is saved in contact diary database independently from risk calculation |
@mtwalli I guess if the app would turn green again the contact would also be removed from the contact journal, maybe you could test that? Because AFAIK the current implementation, at least under iOS, is that risk encounters are removed from the contact journal after they are not displayed anymore on the "Status" tab. |
@mtwalli started error logging and will check in a few days. |
@mtwalli this still occurs. I can provide a screenshot from yesterday and from today, where the entry of 9.9.2022 is gone. |
@DerVogel2020 You are right that the risk disappears from contact journal after 10 days (atm). There was an intended change in
Therefore it is not a bug, however I see that this can be still confusing to the user and Contact Journal might be restricted to configurable age too. |
As I mentioned earlier, this is working as designed and no plan to change it in the future. |
Avoid duplicates
Technical details
Describe the bug
I had a red tile in the app. Today it is gone, because the risk calculation only considers 10 days now.
But I expect this contacts still to be shown in the journal because there are still 15 days shown.
Steps to reproduce the issue
Expected behaviour
The entry at e.g. Tuesday 2 weeks ago was there and should stay there as long as the days is shown in the journal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: