-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: proposer deposit should be burned if proposal does not move into the deposit #12807
Comments
I'm in favor of this 👍 |
Can this be picked up? @marbar3778 |
I guess this need to backport to 0.46? |
This would be state breaking, no? If so, we cannot really backport to 0.46 |
Can this be added to 0.47? The current spam situation is just getting worse in cosmos governance. |
v0.47 is feature frozen. However, this is included https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/UPGRADING.md#minimum-proposal-deposit-at-time-of-submission and will probably solve that spam issue. |
I don't know why this was left out, if there is no penalty spam depositors will just get their money back even with a 20% min deposit. |
You are right! |
Summary of Bug
In #12771 we introduced a min proposer deposit at submission time.
The feature was ported from osmosis-labs#296
However, we later discovered that Osmosis sdk fork differs from this repository. Osmosis burns the deposit if it does not move into the voting period but this repository returns it.
Since #12771 was a direct backport, this important difference was left out.
We should be burning the proposer deposit from submission time so that it is an effective measure against spam resistance.
Version
main
branchSteps to Reproduce
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: