Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update documentation for Stargate #6953

Closed
aaronc opened this issue Aug 5, 2020 · 9 comments
Closed

Update documentation for Stargate #6953

aaronc opened this issue Aug 5, 2020 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
T:Docs Changes and features related to documentation.

Comments

@aaronc
Copy link
Member

aaronc commented Aug 5, 2020

Details of this epic is broken into sub-issues and tracked on Codetree as an epic.

@aaronc aaronc added this to the v0.40 [Stargate] milestone Aug 5, 2020
@aaronc aaronc added the T:Docs Changes and features related to documentation. label Aug 5, 2020
@alexanderbez
Copy link
Contributor

alexanderbez commented Sep 25, 2020

do-not-edit-start-codetree-epic-issues

Issues in this epic:

Title Milestone Assignees State
document how to create a new key type and add it to the keyring #6500 Post-Stargate Feature Backlog N/A Open
Write SPEC for x/fee_grant #8456 N/A atheeshp Closed
Ensure documentation reflects limited SIGN_MODE_DIRECT support for multiple signers & multisig signing #8152 v0.40 [Stargate] amaurym, robert-zaremba Closed
Deploy 0.40 docs on "/" #8019 v0.40 [Stargate] N/A Closed
[docs]: client migration guides #7715 v0.40 [Stargate] amaurym Closed
[docs]: Update server/README.md with alternative to simapp.MakeEncodingConfig() #7685 v0.40 [Stargate] robert-zaremba Closed
[docs]: Update Core Concepts section to Stargate #7661 Post-Stargate Feature Backlog amaurym, blushi Closed
[docs]: update building modules section to reflect ADR31 #7660 v0.40 [Stargate] blushi Closed
[docs]: Stargate docs general audit & cleanup #7659 v0.40 [Stargate] amaurym, anilCSE, blushi, clevinson, robert-zaremba Closed
[docs]: update x/staking documentation to stargate #7658 v0.40 [Stargate] amaurym Closed
[docs]: New docs section for interacting with a node / update of "Interface" section #7657 v0.40 [Stargate] amaurym Closed
[docs]: Stargate migration guides #7656 v0.40 [Stargate] anilCSE Closed
Documentation for cosmovisor on docs.cosmos.network #7238 v0.40 [Stargate] jgimeno Closed
do-not-edit-end-codetree-epic-issues

All I would add to this is that we have an FAQ with what we expect to be common questions/pitfalls with regards to Protobuf upgrading, tx signing, upgrading, etc..

Also,

updating individual module documentation (x/module/spec)

On this topic, I would prefer that we keep a single README.md in the module root or spec sub-dir as Atlas (Module Registry) will depend on this. Having a single doc with usage, patterns, state behavior, etc... will be crucial for Atlas. This obviously doesn't need to be done for/by Stargate release, but something to keep in mind as we update module documentation.

@tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

tac0turtle commented Sep 29, 2020

On this topic, I would prefer that we keep a single README.md in the module root or spec sub-dir as Atlas (Module Registry) will depend on this. Having a single doc with usage, patterns, state behavior, etc... will be crucial for Atlas. This obviously doesn't need to be done for/by Stargate release, but something to keep in mind as we update module documentation.

Could this be up to the module author? In the yaml file or however the module gets registered with atlas the author could add a list of docs related to the module and atlas loops through this list?

@amaury1093
Copy link
Contributor

A topic we didn't mention yet is i18n. We have cn,kr,ru docs. I propose to keep those docs for /v0.39, but not for /master.

@clevinson
Copy link
Contributor

General question: Lots of docs reference Gaia source code as an example (e.g app.go), should we be redirecting all of these links to Simd?

@anilcse
Copy link
Collaborator

anilcse commented Oct 1, 2020

General question: Lots of docs reference Gaia source code as an example (e.g app.go), should we be redirecting all of these links to Simd?

That makes sense

@anilcse
Copy link
Collaborator

anilcse commented Oct 16, 2020

@fedekunze you mentioned that you are writing 0.39 -> 0.40 migration docs. Can you reference your PR here if so?

@fedekunze
Copy link
Collaborator

fedekunze commented Oct 16, 2020

hmm I haven't started yet and I wasn't planning to write it on the SDK (just a google doc). I'm waiting to finish cosmos/ethermint#546 first. It's building now but it still needs some fixes

@clevinson
Copy link
Contributor

@fedekunze We'd love to have this incorporated on the docs as well for visibility. If you need help translating them to here we can get someone from the regen team to help, but direct PRs to SDK/docs are welcome!

@amaury1093
Copy link
Contributor

Once docs are finished, we should also make the final switch in https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/versions (and remove the 0.40.x line).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T:Docs Changes and features related to documentation.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants