You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Could be that 346T becomes increasingly beneficial as immunity to JN.1 without 346T develops. The first 346T lineages e.g. in France didn't seem to have growth advantage. Maybe that's changing now.
JN.1 with S:A1087S > S:R346T > S:F59S [17 with 346, US east coast + 1 Canada]
Tricky thing here is that it's not clear how to break into sublineages, if at all. I'd prefer to wait a few more days to see where it makes sense to delineate.
GISAID query:
C26894T,C25680T,G24821T
Could be that 346T becomes increasingly beneficial as immunity to JN.1 without 346T develops. The first 346T lineages e.g. in France didn't seem to have growth advantage. Maybe that's changing now.
JN.1 with S:A1087S > S:R346T > S:F59S [17 with 346, US east coast + 1 Canada]
Tricky thing here is that it's not clear how to break into sublineages, if at all. I'd prefer to wait a few more days to see where it makes sense to delineate.
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome-test.gi.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_test_29456_810590.json
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: