-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MC.13 with S:Q613E (38 seqs, 7 countries) #2793
Comments
24 now. Query: C10681T, A13121T, C23399G, G22599C https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome-test.gi.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice13_genome_test_64fa1_877ac0.json?label=id:node_5654372 |
A better query is : C10681T, A13121T, G22599C, finding 11 samples |
@NkRMnZr please add the 346T sub branch to the proposal |
That includes multiple MC.13+S:R346T branches. |
it's a bit weird, that is splitting on a false kp.3.1.1+S31F branch; |
25, Br |
35, Germany, Singapore |
38 Spain Basque country,Denmark |
Taken from Branch 2 of sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals#1962
Defining Mutations:
MC.13
>C23399G(S:Q613E)
Query:
C10681T, A13121T, C23399G
Earliest seq: 24-06-13 (
EPI_ISL_19265922
, Portugal)Latest seq: 24-09-12 (
EPI_ISL_19430296
, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil)Sampled Countries: Brazil (18: MS), Spain (1), Portugal (1)
Genomes:
for
lineages.csv
commit:epi_isl accessions:
EPI_ISL_19265922, EPI_ISL_19340619, EPI_ISL_19340624, EPI_ISL_19374899, EPI_ISL_19385707, EPI_ISL_19385718, EPI_ISL_19385724, EPI_ISL_19430235, EPI_ISL_19430242, EPI_ISL_19430245, EPI_ISL_19430249-19430252, EPI_ISL_19430254, EPI_ISL_19430256, EPI_ISL_19430269, EPI_ISL_19430282, EPI_ISL_19430293, EPI_ISL_19430296
UShER:
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_1a213_8dc4d0.json?label=id:node_7224120
Trivia:
C>G
mutation on residue 613,Q613E
is much less popolar than famousQ613H
, only sampled about 2K times during the whole pandemic.Spain/CT-LabRefCat-3669331/2024|EPI_ISL_19374899|2024-07-26
andBrazil/MS-FIOCRUZ-FMS422/2024|EPI_ISL_19430282|2024-09-06
probably due to low coverage, but these two seqs both have MC.13's definition andS:Q613E
so they likely belong to this sub-branch.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: