Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P3379 R0 Constrain std::expected equality operators #2036

Open
wg21bot opened this issue Sep 21, 2024 · 6 comments · May be fixed by cplusplus/draft#7449
Open

P3379 R0 Constrain std::expected equality operators #2036

wg21bot opened this issue Sep 21, 2024 · 6 comments · May be fixed by cplusplus/draft#7449
Labels
B2 - improvement Bucket 2 as described by P0592: bug fixes, performance improvements, integration fixes for/between e C++26 Targeted at C++26 IS Ship vehicle: IS LWG Library plenary-approved Papers approved for inclusion in their target vehicle by plenary vote. size - tiny paper size estimate, smaller than small
Milestone

Comments

@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator

wg21bot commented Sep 21, 2024

P3379R0 Constrain std::expected equality operators (Jonathan Wakely)

@wg21bot wg21bot added the LEWG Library Evolution label Sep 21, 2024
@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2024-telecon milestone Sep 21, 2024
@inbal2l inbal2l added IS Ship vehicle: IS B2 - improvement Bucket 2 as described by P0592: bug fixes, performance improvements, integration fixes for/between e C++26 Targeted at C++26 labels Sep 22, 2024
@inbal2l
Copy link
Collaborator

inbal2l commented Sep 22, 2024

A motion for sending directly to LWG for C++26 as a wording fix (skipping EP) was started (ends on Oct 7th):
https://lists.isocpp.org/lib-ext/2024/09/27951.php
(asking if there's any objection to unanimous consent)

@inbal2l inbal2l added LWG Library ready-for-library-evolution-meeting-review This paper needs to be discussed at a Library Evolution meeting scheduled-for-library-evolution This paper has been scheduled for one of the groups: LEWG, LEWG Incubator, or a Mailing List review size - tiny paper size estimate, smaller than small labels Sep 22, 2024
@inbal2l
Copy link
Collaborator

inbal2l commented Oct 9, 2024

No objection to sending the paper to LWG as a wording fix, motion passed (https://lists.isocpp.org/lib-ext/current/28152.php)

@inbal2l inbal2l added lwg-pending LWG Chair needs to disposition and removed LEWG Library Evolution ready-for-library-evolution-meeting-review This paper needs to be discussed at a Library Evolution meeting scheduled-for-library-evolution This paper has been scheduled for one of the groups: LEWG, LEWG Incubator, or a Mailing List review labels Oct 9, 2024
@JeffGarland JeffGarland removed the lwg-pending LWG Chair needs to disposition label Oct 18, 2024
@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Oct 21, 2024

I've just uploaded R1 with a small wording fix, but it wasn't in the recent mailing. We should use R1 when reviewing it in LWG. https://wg21.link/p3379r1

@bstamour
Copy link
Collaborator

LWG polled this paper in Wroclaw: Poll: put P3379r0 into C++26?
|F|A|N|
|6|0|0|

@bstamour bstamour moved this to Tentatively Ready in 2024 Poland LWG Schedule Nov 18, 2024
@bstamour
Copy link
Collaborator

@cor3ntin cor3ntin added the plenary-approved Papers approved for inclusion in their target vehicle by plenary vote. label Nov 23, 2024
@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Nov 27, 2024

I've just uploaded R1 with a small wording fix, but it wasn't in the recent mailing. We should use R1 when reviewing it in LWG. https://wg21.link/p3379r1

I've reverted R1 to draft status, so it doesn't get published in a mailing. The link to the draft is
https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D3379R1.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
B2 - improvement Bucket 2 as described by P0592: bug fixes, performance improvements, integration fixes for/between e C++26 Targeted at C++26 IS Ship vehicle: IS LWG Library plenary-approved Papers approved for inclusion in their target vehicle by plenary vote. size - tiny paper size estimate, smaller than small
Projects
Status: Tentatively Ready
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants