Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple authors #896

Closed
angrybrad opened this issue Jan 31, 2017 · 10 comments
Closed

Multiple authors #896

angrybrad opened this issue Jan 31, 2017 · 10 comments
Labels
content governance 🏛️ features related to content governance enhancement improvements to existing features

Comments

@angrybrad
Copy link
Member

Created by: PlutoMars (Limey.pluto@gmail.com) on 2015/03/20 09:37:19 +0000
Votes at time of UserVoice import: 14


It would be very useful if multiple authors could be assigned to a single article. Especially 2-3 editors cooperating closely on a single article, without giving entire groups access, or having to create user groups for 2-3 people.

@angrybrad
Copy link
Member Author

Posted by Anonymous (jmenberg@web.de) on 2015/07/11 08:47:41 +0000


Yes please! That would be perfect. As multi-author blogging / collaborative writing gets generally more and more important, this feature seems quite necessary. Thanks for consideration!

@angrybrad
Copy link
Member Author

Posted by PlutoMars (Limey.pluto@gmail.com) on 2015/03/20 09:37:19 +0000


In ExpressionEngine this is possible... (one of the few things I still like about it)

@timkelty
Copy link
Contributor

timkelty commented Mar 16, 2017

Along similar lines, it would be nice if entries were allowed to have NO author.

I've wanted this specifically when dealing with imported entries with no author.

Currently, I end up having to import to a "default" user, and then check if an entry is authored by that user before I display the author attribution.

Additionally, when using something like the Guest Entries plugin, you wouldn't need to assign a default author.

@narration-sd
Copy link
Contributor

@timkelty, think it would be wiser to keep that default user.

There are a lot of things in Craft that depend on identity and privileges; would no doubt be hard to circumvent them. Thus sensilbly you are back to a default user/author, and in more control if you provide it.

I have used the admin as author, of course, but later changed from this and don't recommend it, for reasons you can no doubt see...

@timkelty
Copy link
Contributor

timkelty commented Mar 17, 2017

@narration-sd I totally get what you're saying, but not sure I agree. Certainly not suggesting it would be a trivial feature to implement by any means.

There are a lot of things in Craft that depend on identity and privileges; would no doubt be hard to circumvent them.

Very true, however we're mostly just talking about validation changes to EntryModel. Other elements (e.g. assets, categories) don't even have authors at all.

Craft's granular permissions are actually why I'd like to see special handling for a "no author" scenario. Consider the following:

  • A section of reviews entries
  • A member group siteMembers that has permission to:
    • Edit & Publish reviews
    • ...But NOT Edit other authors’ entries (i.e. they can only edit their own reviews)
  • A set of import/programmatically created reviews, some with no author, so were assigned a "default user".

At this point I'd like siteMembers to be able to edit reviews that don't have a "real" author, but can't because their permissions don't allow it.

@brandonkelly brandonkelly added enhancement improvements to existing features and removed enhancement improvements to existing features feature labels Mar 5, 2019
@bzin
Copy link

bzin commented May 13, 2019

Was wondering about this feature request @brandonkelly. Are you guys shipping this soon on a 3.1 version or in a later? :)

@brandonkelly
Copy link
Member

@bzin No current plans to implement multi-author entries right now.

@boboldehampsink
Copy link
Contributor

boboldehampsink commented Jul 4, 2019

I could use this for a lot of my clients. I use it to set permissions on an per entry-basis

@furioursus
Copy link

This would be amazing for @CityofOakland, as we often have staff that our digital leads only want accessing one single entry in a section on the site.

@brandonkelly brandonkelly added this to the 3.6 milestone Jul 13, 2020
@brandonkelly brandonkelly added the content governance 🏛️ features related to content governance label Jul 13, 2020
@watershed
Copy link

Just adding my +1 to this feature request.

One of the very few areas where I find Craft will not bend to my will ;)

I see above that it's added to the planned scope of Craft 3.6, which is great news.

@craftcms craftcms locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 22, 2021

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
content governance 🏛️ features related to content governance enhancement improvements to existing features
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants