You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recently I checked Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) improvements on multiple projects. The results are here. LLVM-related results are here. According to the tests, PGO usually helps with the compiler and compiler-like workloads (like static analysis). That's why I think trying to optimize Creusot with PGO can be a good idea.
I can suggest the following action points:
Perform PGO benchmarks on Creusot. And if it shows improvements - add a note about possible improvements in Creusot's performance with PGO.
Providing an easier way (e.g. a build option) to build scripts with PGO can be helpful for the end-users and maintainers since they will be able to optimize Creusot according to their own workloads.
Maybe testing Post-Link Optimization techniques (like LLVM BOLT) would be interesting too but I recommend starting from the usual PGO.
For the Rust projects, I suggest PGO optimizing with cargo-pgo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
Recently I checked Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) improvements on multiple projects. The results are here. LLVM-related results are here. According to the tests, PGO usually helps with the compiler and compiler-like workloads (like static analysis). That's why I think trying to optimize Creusot with PGO can be a good idea.
I can suggest the following action points:
Maybe testing Post-Link Optimization techniques (like LLVM BOLT) would be interesting too but I recommend starting from the usual PGO.
For the Rust projects, I suggest PGO optimizing with cargo-pgo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: