We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I think next/predecessor will be more intuitive than sons/father for the CFG (https://github.com/crytic/slither/blob/master/slither/core/cfg/node.py)
This will be a breaking change, but most likely not too many external code relies on this.
I would in favor to keep in parallel keep sons and fathers for a few iteration but making it clear that they are deprecated
sons
fathers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I think next/predecessor will be more intuitive than sons/father for the CFG (https://github.com/crytic/slither/blob/master/slither/core/cfg/node.py)
This will be a breaking change, but most likely not too many external code relies on this.
I would in favor to keep in parallel keep
sons
andfathers
for a few iteration but making it clear that they are deprecatedThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: