You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 4, 2023. It is now read-only.
I was just wondering, in instances where there is a cluster 1 but no cluster 0 (see below), does this mean that the detected units that would usually fall into cluster 0 have all grouped together to form cluster 1 instead? Is it likely that this cluster represents MUA/noise rather than SUA?
Many thanks,
Erica
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Technically cluster 0 are the spikes thar are too far away from the known templates and usually (not a real criterion) cluster 1 is the main clusters and MUA. In your case, everything is really similar to the single template found.
In my opinion:
-Try with a positive threshold I saw a few positive peaks
That is MUA (or maybe just noise with a peak, try increasing a the detection threshold) and oddly fast for a neuron
Other than noticing a large number of spikes that break the refractory limit, what are some other ways you can distinguish MUA from SUA in the wave_clus output?
Hi Ferchaure,
I was just wondering, in instances where there is a cluster 1 but no cluster 0 (see below), does this mean that the detected units that would usually fall into cluster 0 have all grouped together to form cluster 1 instead? Is it likely that this cluster represents MUA/noise rather than SUA?
Many thanks,
Erica
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: