look into support for pyraminx, skewb, megaminx and sq1.

[eff96]

pyraminx and sq1 already have notation for every single face so this can be finished, but megaminx has 12 faces, and skewb is usually turned by rotating it in a 45° angle to do sledgehammers, several limitations can be made for those 2.

[lgarron]

We have these puzzles implemented for v2! https://experiments.cubing.net/cubing.js/alg.cubing.net/index.html

The main issue is picking a set of notation. We could use research from talking to cubers and theorists for notation that:

1. is easy to understand,
2. matches common use, and
3. is as consistent as possible across different puzzles.

[eff96]

just use the classic WCA notation, i dont see what's wrong with it.

also in clock i cant write UR2-, i have to write UR10.

[lgarron]

just use the classic WCA notation, i dont see what's wrong with it.

I'd like to be careful about this. The community uses some conventions outside of WCA notation, and I think we should at least make sure to support an appropriate set of compatible extensions.

also in clock i cant write UR2-, i have to write UR10.

UR2' should work. But I would also like to support UR2-, which I haven't incorporated into the parser so far.

[eff96]

for square-1, remove the space between commas and parentheses, so doing M2 would be:
1,0/-1,-1/0,1
parentheses waste time typing and so does the space next to the commas.

for megaminx, use the old wca notation for megaminx.

pyraminx you can use wca.

for skewb i dont know since people rotate in weird ways to turn fast.

EDIT: you can use karnaukh notation for sq1, its really good.
EDIT: im big stupid, use wca conflict notation for skewb.