Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please publish the new Python bindings on PyPI #277

Open
musicinmybrain opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Please publish the new Python bindings on PyPI #277

musicinmybrain opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@musicinmybrain
Copy link
Contributor

🤔 What's the problem you're trying to solve?

The new Python bindings are not published on PyPI at https://pypi.org/project/cucumber-messages/, which means:

  • They are not very accessible to Python users, who expect to be able to pip install cucumber-messages in a virtual environment.
  • There is a risk that someone could register a different project as cucumber-messages, causing – at best – confusion.
  • Distributions packaging the Python bindings cannot achieve PyPI parity.

✨ What's your proposed solution?

Please consider publishing the Python bindings on PyPI as https://pypi.org/project/cucumber-messages/ at your earliest convenience.

⛏ Have you considered any alternatives or workarounds?

As described in Fedora’s PyPI parity guidelines, I could work with the PyPI admins to block the project on your behalf, but it seems like this should be unnecessary given this is an active project and there are no obvious obstacles to publishing on PyPI.

📚 Any additional context?

See also this discussion on the Python Discourse.

@mpkorstanje
Copy link
Contributor

Being worked on. Unfortunately we don't have a dedicated maintainer for Python and this is mostly volenteer based, so this will move at the speed of peoples available time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants