We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cue version
$ cue version cue version v0.0.0-20221001181137-79d80efc2882 -buildmode exe -compiler gc CGO_ENABLED 1 GOARCH amd64 GOOS linux GOAMD64 v1 vcs git vcs.revision 79d80efc288208410f77d47ae9aedd37e106d84b vcs.time 2022-10-01T18:11:37Z vcs.modified false
No, it's on tip only.
exec cue export test.cue cmp stdout expect.json -- test.cue -- in: { foo: { bar: "" baz: "" } } out: { for k, v in in for vk, vv in v { "\(k)": "\(vk)": vv } } -- expect.json -- { "in": { "foo": { "bar": "", "baz": "" } }, "out": { "foo": { "bar": "", "baz": "" } } }
A passing testscript run.
testscript
> exec cue export test.cue [stdout] { "in": { "foo": { "bar": "", "baz": "" } }, "out": { "foo": { "bar": "" } } } > cmp stdout expect.json --- stdout +++ expect.json @@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ }, "out": { "foo": { - "bar": "" + "bar": "", + "baz": "" } } } FAIL: /tmp/testscript382054878/x.txtar/script.txtar:2: stdout and expect.json differ
Thanks to @fionera on the CUE Slack for reporting this issue. Bisected to 6b3fd65
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is caused by an overaggressive performance optimization which was a bit overzealous removing duplicates.
Sorry, something went wrong.
74b4288
No branches or pull requests
What version of CUE are you using (
cue version
)?Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?
No, it's on tip only.
What did you do?
What did you expect to see?
A passing
testscript
run.What did you see instead?
Thanks to @fionera on the CUE Slack for reporting this issue.
Bisected to 6b3fd65
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: