Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Polyon point becomes significantly bigger when selected and released unlike previous versions hindering accurate annotation #2329

Closed
2 tasks done
arasharchor opened this issue Oct 17, 2020 · 8 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@arasharchor
Copy link

arasharchor commented Oct 17, 2020

My actions before raising this issue

Expected Behaviour

If a point is selected and mouse gets away from it, its size shall not change similar to the early versions.

Current Behaviour

When a point is select and mouse gets away from it, it becomes significantly bigger which hinders to see the area near that point.
Screenshot from 2020-10-17 14-01-11
Screenshot from 2020-10-17 14-01-18
Screenshot from 2020-10-17 14-01-27
Screenshot from 2020-10-17 14-01-34
Screenshot from 2020-10-17 14-02-02
Screenshot from 2020-10-17 14-02-06

Possible Solution

Reverting back to the previous settings?!

Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)

  1. start with creating a polygon.
  2. create a point a release the mouse click. you see the points are becoming significantly bigger.
  3. when you select another point and keep the left mouse click still pressed, the points appear with normal size, but as soon a you release the left click, they come larger.

Context

It does not allow fine annotation because it blocks to see area near that point.

Your Environment

Origin/develop branch - 19th October 2020
Linux

@arasharchor arasharchor changed the title Point becomes significantly bigger when selected and released unlike previous versions Polyon point becomes significantly bigger when selected and released unlike previous versions hindering accurate annotation Oct 17, 2020
@bsekachev
Copy link
Member

Please, provide exact version (not latest) and git hash.

@bsekachev
Copy link
Member

I would say we have fixed similar issue in #2307

@arasharchor
Copy link
Author

Oops!
@bsekachev
I used the "origin/develop" branch which has the commit dating until October 9th. 2020. I did not use any specific git tags as I wanted to clone the latest develop version.
I see the commit below as the latest commit by calling "git log"

commit 2b221d2
Author: tdowgiel tomasz.dowgielewicz@intel.com
Date: Fri Oct 9 21:13:47 2020 +0200

Thanks. I see issue in #2307 dates back to 8 days ago. I will pull the merge and try again. I will update this issue afterwards.

@arasharchor
Copy link
Author

arasharchor commented Oct 20, 2020

@bsekachev

I just pulled the repo by "git pull" and compiled it again
"docker-compose -f docker-compose.yml -f components/serverless/docker-compose.serverless.yml -f components/analytics/docker-compose.analytics.yml up -d"
Still points appear to be bigger when selected and released.

Is there any way to define the point size when released?

@bsekachev
Copy link
Member

up -d doesn't rebuild image.
You need to use up --build -d

@bsekachev bsekachev added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 21, 2020
@arasharchor
Copy link
Author

@bsekachev
Oh I missed it. Now it is being built, but it takes long to finish.
In this way, even by a tiny modification in the code, the whole repo has to be built again.
I am wondering whether there is any alternatives to compile the code faster and see the changes.

@bsekachev
Copy link
Member

@smajida

Internally we use docker deployment only for production. For development & debugging we install the whole system on a host operating system. The process is described in CONTRIBUTING.md

@arasharchor
Copy link
Author

@bsekachev
Thanks for the explanation.
I can confirm that the issue has been solved. I will then close the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants