Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Microsoft CSAF in the sources #84

Closed
Rafiot opened this issue Nov 13, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed

Add Microsoft CSAF in the sources #84

Rafiot opened this issue Nov 13, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Rafiot
Copy link
Collaborator

Rafiot commented Nov 13, 2024

https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/provider-metadata.json

@Rafiot Rafiot self-assigned this Nov 13, 2024
@jonite
Copy link

jonite commented Nov 15, 2024

While adding MSFT, could you also add NCSC-NL CSAF?
https://vulnerabilities.ncsc.nl/csaf/

@adulau adulau added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 16, 2024
@cedricbonhomme
Copy link
Member

While adding MSFT, could you also add NCSC-NL CSAF? https://vulnerabilities.ncsc.nl/csaf/

Just to mention that we do have sightings from NCSC-NL:
https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sightings/?query=ncsc

@Rafiot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Rafiot commented Nov 19, 2024

That's what happen when trying to load Microsoft CSAF, investigating further.

{"time":"2024-11-19T14:41:39+01:00","level":"INFO","msg":"AdvisoryFileProcessor.Process: \"https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/changes.csv\" has an invalid time stamp in line 91: parsing time \"2024-11-12T08:00:00.0000000\" as \"2006-01-02T15:04:05Z07:00\": cannot parse \"\" as \"Z07:00\""}

gocsaf/csaf#588

@Rafiot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Rafiot commented Nov 19, 2024

@jonite just checking, in case ou know: the CSAF from NCSC NL seems to be a clone of the NVD. Is there anything else in there?

@jonite
Copy link

jonite commented Nov 27, 2024

Thanks for looking into it, the advisory feed is probably a better option then:
https://advisories.ncsc.nl/csaf/

After publication of CSAF 2.1 advisories are created also in that standard. Further, new features will be added in the 2.1 version, likely including also a new score. As part of the change it is also planned to change the assessment method for advisories from probability/severity to urgency with three proposed levels.

@Rafiot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Rafiot commented Nov 27, 2024

sounds good, and you also have your own IDs, which makes things easier to manage. I'll work on that asap.

@Rafiot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Rafiot commented Jan 9, 2025

Fixed by 60f0e49

@Rafiot Rafiot closed this as completed Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants