-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rework POIs #207
Comments
Here are my reflexions about POI display, nothing crazy but I hope it helps to clarify this rework. I wrote them as categorization rules, from higher to lower priority (By "priority" I mean "should hide a less important one at the same place") 1) Bicycle-specific amenitiesEx: bicycle parking, bicycle location, repair.. as listed in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Facilities) This category is the most important, icons should be readable and high-contrasted. 2) Public transportationEx: metro, tramway and train station, airport Important because they are common target destination, meeting point, and useful to localize yourself on the map. And some trains allow bike transportation. I think they should have a unique color too (purple?) Maybe public bicycle sharing (like velib) should share the same color ? Zoom level should be what we're used to : national network from medium zoom, urban network at high zoom. Icons becoming bigger and labeled when zooming in. 3) Amenities you're likely to use when cycling, even if not directly related to bicycleEx: drinking_water, public toilets, sport shops, shelters Could be unsaturated green, like footway. They should be easy to spot because someday you will need to adapt your route to reach them. 4) Tourism POIEx of amenities: view point, picnic table, camping, tourism office I guess they should be highlighted because I assume many map readers are bicycle-touring. But not very important : Icons should not have flashy color (brown ?) and should be small. Zoom level for attractions depends on how attractive it generally is. Tag 5) All other useful POIOf course, useless POI should be removed completely for readability. I see two interesting use cases:
They have very low priority, but still good to display if there is nothing else at the same place, at least for orientation. For this reason, if they are visible from far they should appear from medium zoom. They should be small gray icons What do you think ? |
Wow, thanks for this very cool feedback! It's a very good starting point in my opinion (and I agree with most of the design ideas :).
I see a question here with respect to hospital and pharmacy. So far, these are considered as "emergency" features (together with For the record, the current rendering order (in terms of priority, first ones hide the ones coming after) is:
|
Good question about emergency features. Maybe hospital areas could be yellow (like in OSM). Anyway hospital icons should be visible from medium zoom because they generally are big. Emergency phones could be highlithed because I guess they are rare or limited to relatively desert area. I don't what what's the best for pharmacies : they might be useful but they are very common in some cities. Maybe a very small green + |
I guess we can close that one. |
Related to #64, #142 and #169.
Once a list of POIs more or less fixed, we should rework the icons to have a uniform and coherent set of icons (sizes, styles).
We should rework colors. The food shop (purple) and pharmacies (red) are too strong and attract too much the eye with respect to the POIs with a lot of added value (bicycle, drinking water, toilets etc). An idea is to desaturate it completely (no more colors) and put back colors on some very particular POIs we want to emphasize.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: