You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the task_events DB table grows without bound.
This is desirable from a provenance perspective, for finite-length science experiments; but probably not desirable for large endlessly-cycling weather prediction workflows (for example).
We should keep all information by default, but should we allow old info to be deleted at some cut-off point behind the active window? (By number of cycle points and/or by cycle point offset and/or by real time offset interval).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the
task_events
DB table grows without bound.This is desirable from a provenance perspective, for finite-length science experiments; but probably not desirable for large endlessly-cycling weather prediction workflows (for example).
We should keep all information by default, but should we allow old info to be deleted at some cut-off point behind the active window? (By number of cycle points and/or by cycle point offset and/or by real time offset interval).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: