Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How is this compatible with the W3C VCDM v2? #3

Open
peacekeeper opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

How is this compatible with the W3C VCDM v2? #3

peacekeeper opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@peacekeeper
Copy link

This document says that it is compatible with the W3C VCDM v2, but I cannot see how?

None of the examples in this document seem to be conformant VC documents, or even compatible with the VC ecosystem.

@awoie
Copy link

awoie commented Mar 20, 2024

The document does not say that all SD-JWT VCDM have to be VCDM v2-compliant. But you can define documents that are. That is why this work is VCDM v2 compatible. Nobody prevents you from putting VCDM v2 claims in an SD-JWT VCDM.

@peacekeeper
Copy link
Author

peacekeeper commented Mar 20, 2024

Thanks @awoie

So when the SD-JWT VCDM document says it "is compatible with the W3C VCDM v2", then what that means is that some documents can be defined to be conformant, but the SD-JWT VCDM format itself is NOT automatically conformant, or compatible with the VC ecosystem?

Did I get that right?

@peacekeeper
Copy link
Author

you can define documents that are

I think it would be useful to see a SD-JWT VCDM document that is VCDM v2-compliant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants