You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been experimenting with siroc and it has been quite easy to implement. The only use case that I have encountered so far that hasn't been supported "out-of-the-box" is running the resulting bundles through Node once built. I have been able to use @rollup/plugin-run in the rollup options do this, but I wonder if this is something that you would like to support via the library via some sort of --run option. This is something that I saw in my research of esbuild-based tools like estrella and esmon.
Ideally, I would be able to:
Use siroc build --run to build and run a package once;
Use siroc build --watch --run to build and run a package that reloads on changes; and,
Pass through options to the underlying @rollup/plugin-run (like the execArgv option in @rollup/plugin-run allows).
Of course, if you decide not to take this on, no worries -- the existing experience already works well for me!
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! 👋 Thank you for building
siroc
.I have been experimenting with
siroc
and it has been quite easy to implement. The only use case that I have encountered so far that hasn't been supported "out-of-the-box" is running the resulting bundles through Node once built. I have been able to use@rollup/plugin-run
in therollup
options do this, but I wonder if this is something that you would like to support via the library via some sort of--run
option. This is something that I saw in my research ofesbuild
-based tools likeestrella
andesmon
.Ideally, I would be able to:
siroc build --run
to build and run a package once;siroc build --watch --run
to build and run a package that reloads on changes; and,@rollup/plugin-run
(like theexecArgv
option in@rollup/plugin-run
allows).Of course, if you decide not to take this on, no worries -- the existing experience already works well for me!
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: