sort_constructors_first rule: accessors proposal

[aemino]

After enabling the sort_constructors_first rule, I noticed that accessors are considered by the rule to be methods rather than properties. I'd like to start a quick discussion about whether this should be the case. In my code, I usually sort these first because to me, they more or less appeal as properties. However, I can completely understand the other side of this argument. Wondering what other people think about this.

[a14n]

Flutter style guide prefers grouping by function not by type.

[aemino]

Perhaps I'm not reading it properly, but what you linked seems to be about the ordering of methods and fields; I don't see the relation to the constructor.

[a14n]

I have misunderstood your request because I thought sort_constructors_first came from Flutter style guide's rule Order class members by typical lifecycle (I dunno if this comment should be seen as a side note or as an issue).

@pq : was sort_constructors_first implemented to enforce Flutter style guide rule Order class members by typical lifecycle ?

[pq]

@a14n : 👍 it was for Flutter style.