You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, Aspect will complain if you try to construct it outside of a Composite. Furthermore, the API requires that all Aspect derivations must accept a Composite* as their first argument. This is mostly a residual design from the Addon concept.
Given how the Aspect concept has evolved away from the Addon concept, I think we should eliminate this requirement. It is already a worthless requirement since the Aspect::setComposite(~) function will be called after construction anyway.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently,
Aspect
will complain if you try to construct it outside of aComposite
. Furthermore, the API requires that allAspect
derivations must accept aComposite*
as their first argument. This is mostly a residual design from theAddon
concept.Given how the
Aspect
concept has evolved away from theAddon
concept, I think we should eliminate this requirement. It is already a worthless requirement since theAspect::setComposite(~)
function will be called after construction anyway.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: