You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I'm reviewing the STR coordinates in the reference bed file for hg19 assembly. I noticed that the gene NIPA1 is located on the minus strand in hg19, while in the newer hg38 assembly, it's placed on the positive strand. As a result, when I examine the hg19 coordinates in a genome browser, the motif appears as CGC, contrasting with the GCG motif in hg38. I'm unsure about how TRGT functions and whether it can detect such changes.
hg19
hg38
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks @Tianyibian! We will have to think how to adjust our data format to account for these kinds of differences.
I really appreciate you taking the time to look at these loci in detail.
Hello, I'm reviewing the STR coordinates in the reference bed file for hg19 assembly. I noticed that the gene NIPA1 is located on the minus strand in hg19, while in the newer hg38 assembly, it's placed on the positive strand. As a result, when I examine the hg19 coordinates in a genome browser, the motif appears as CGC, contrasting with the GCG motif in hg38. I'm unsure about how TRGT functions and whether it can detect such changes.
hg19
hg38
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: