Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v0.10.0 doesn't create 'auth-secrets' secret when metadata_service_authentication is enabled in the helm chart #7508

Closed
nachiket-juneja opened this issue Mar 7, 2023 · 7 comments
Labels
bug Bug report stale

Comments

@nachiket-juneja
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug
We've been trying to install the latest 0.10.0 version of DataHub and we feel there is a bug. We currently have enabled the metadata_service_authentication flag in the value.yaml in the helm installation. We are now moving to 0.10.0 using chart version 0.2.154.
When metadata_service_authentication value is true, the system-update job fails with the CreateConfigError since the 'datahub-auth-secrets' secret doesn't get created. On the other hand, if we put metadata_service_authentication as false, the system update job passes and the secret is also created successfully.
Maybe an issue with the helm templates which creates the secret. Unsure about the root cause, but I think this could be a potential problem.
Please let me know if this is the desired behavior or we are missing something.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Enable metadata_service_authentication to true in the 'global' section in the values.yaml for the datahub helm chart
  2. Set the datahub version to 0.10.0
  3. Run the helm install command. The system-update-job throws an ContainerConfigError since the datahub-auth-secrets secret is not created.

Expected behavior
Datahub should have installed successfully without any errors

@nachiket-juneja nachiket-juneja added the bug Bug report label Mar 7, 2023
@matthijsvanderloos
Copy link

I created an issue for this in the DataHub Helm repo as well: acryldata/datahub-helm#265

@nachiket-juneja
Copy link
Contributor Author

Any updates on this?

@jinlintt
Copy link
Contributor

Any updates on this? We are seeing exactly same issue.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. If you believe this is still an issue on the latest DataHub release please leave a comment with the version that you tested it with. If this is a question/discussion please head to https://slack.datahubproject.io. For feature requests please use https://feature-requests.datahubproject.io

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Apr 30, 2023
@MadisLemsalu
Copy link

Same issue here

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label May 5, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 4, 2023

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. If you believe this is still an issue on the latest DataHub release please leave a comment with the version that you tested it with. If this is a question/discussion please head to https://slack.datahubproject.io. For feature requests please use https://feature-requests.datahubproject.io

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jun 4, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2023

This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 30 days since being marked as stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Bug report stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants