You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I understand why the authors choose to support broom models but broom only covers S3 models. Changepoint models are widely used in a range of fields and practitioners often struggle to write the models down mathematically. The changepoint suite of packages fit a range of different changepoint models all built upon the cpt S4 class. I would be willing to work with the equatiomatic authors to include provision for the cpt S4 class.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi - I appreciate the suggestion. This is not something I would personally feel comfortable implementing (I don't know the models well enough) but I'm happy to have a discussion and possibly (probably) accept a PR.
I understand why the authors choose to support broom models but broom only covers S3 models. Changepoint models are widely used in a range of fields and practitioners often struggle to write the models down mathematically. The changepoint suite of packages fit a range of different changepoint models all built upon the cpt S4 class. I would be willing to work with the equatiomatic authors to include provision for the cpt S4 class.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: