Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Improvement] Remove sequence dependencies in test with annotation Order #995

Closed
yuqi1129 opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1197
Closed

[Improvement] Remove sequence dependencies in test with annotation Order #995

yuqi1129 opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1197
Assignees
@yuqi1129
Labels
improvement Improvements on everything
Milestone
Gravitino 0.4.0

Comments

@yuqi1129
Copy link
Contributor

yuqi1129 commented Dec 6, 2023

What would you like to be improved?

The ordered test will be executed sequentially, which would be time-consuming. We should not rely on this feature.

How should we improve?

No response
@yuqi1129 yuqi1129 added the improvement Improvements on everything label Dec 6, 2023
@yuqi1129 yuqi1129 added this to the Gravitino 0.4.0 milestone Dec 6, 2023
@yuqi1129 yuqi1129 mentioned this issue Dec 18, 2023
Merged
jerryshao pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2023
@yuqi1129
[#995] improvement(test): Remove annotation Order to alleviate test s…
0ef2899 
…equence dependency (#1197)

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove Junit5 annotation `Order` in test.

### Why are the changes needed?

We need to remove sequence dependencies between test cases so that we
can run them in parallelism.

Fix: #995 

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

N/A

### How was this patch tested?

Only changes to the test code have been made.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@yuqi1129 yuqi1129

Labels
improvement Improvements on everything
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Gravitino 0.4.0
1 participant
@yuqi1129