What features would you like to see? #991
Replies: 11 comments 6 replies
-
There have been a few ideas on Discord and in previous discussions that might be worth mentioning here again. Installing extensions in the browser has been talked about as a Christmas present for years, right? 😁 We also had a bit more discussion about semantic HTML. Personally, I would like to see default layouts use more semantic HTML elements instead of nesting everything in div elements. Div elements are still useful and even needed for extensions, but the basic structure of a website can be designed just as well with semantic elements such as |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am actually very happy with Yellow. If life were a musical request program, I would wish for three things.
😀 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I, too, am very happy with Yellow. Things, hacks and other features I frequently add by changing the code or including them in my personal extension/plugin are:
One bigger issue I have is related to how Yellow changes filenames and paths of pages. While I understand why Yellow does rename files, it happened to me too often that links broke because pages got renamed without anybody noticing at the time it happened and when it could have been quickly reverted. However, I have not yet come up with a good alternative. One more specific issue: Does the regex in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would be very happy if the edit panel could be better designed so that I can ensure that all the buttons that are important to me are also accessible in portrait mode on mobile. And maybe an option for inline editing when I'm logged in. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yellow 1.0 is great news! I too am very happy with Yellow and actually I use it also for not-so-small sites (Dialegesthai has almost 1200 pages and 60 MB of text) and it works perfectly also for them. Kudos to the developers for the wonderful work! As regards ideas for anything missing: I think that the core (with the core extensions) is excellent as it is. Perhaps a file manager (see #66 and #130) would be a much welcome complement to Edit for those who prefer to modify a site in their browser instead of using a text editor + FTP. All the other things that come to my mind belong in the extensions. Perhaps it would be useful to maintain a public list of ideas for new extensions? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would like to see a revised sorting/grouping of pages (by title/tag) that works with special characters like (german) umlauts. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
A fix for a general issue with markdown parsing would be nice: If you write an email address with a longer domain than 3 charakters like a '.vision' domain (e.g., info@hello.vision), the markdown extension generates a link like info@hello.vision, leaving the 'ion' part outside the link. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It would be very cool a plugin for events, with a calendar. Like those we see in the libraries websites. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
A new website, using this plugin, is under construction: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would also like to be able to create new posts via CLI using the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There is a relatively new mastodon backlink feature in Mastodon which would be nice. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello everybody out there using Datenstrom Yellow. We are moving towards a 1.0 version and it would be great to collect more ideas. I think the application feels lightweight and fast. Although it is designed for small websites, some people use it with hundreds of pages. What would you like to see? Anything not working or missing that you need? What do you like/dislike?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions