-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 197
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rho for Adaptive Sharpness Aware Minimization (ASAM) #37
Comments
Hi, thank you very much for working on ASAM, it's a very clever improvement of the original SAM. I've updated the results, thanks for running the grid search! :) |
Thanks for the update! :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi.
This is Jungmin Kwon, one of the authors of Adaptive Sharpness Aware Minimization (ASAM).
We really appreciate your great implementation!
I have performed cifar10 tests with your code and we found that ASAM with rho=2.0 shows the best accuracy among [0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0].
The test error rates obtained from the grid search are as follows:
In our implementation without bias (or beta for BatchNorm) normalization (https://github.com/SamsungLabs/ASAM), ASAM with rho=0.5 shows the best accuracy (2.37 % for WRN16-8), so we performed all the cifar10 tests with rho=0.5.
If you don't mind, could you update the table of test error rate with the result of rho=2.0 (2.55 %)?
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: