Issue with TC-Wet, Bright and Disturbance in LSP TSA Analysis on CAT (SPLITS) #154
Unanswered
prenner-eo
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi Paul, sorry for the late reply.. We have experienced difficulties with the SPLITS code as well.. In response to this, we have implemented a polar-based LSP approach. Can you please try if these phenometrics work better for you? They are usually much more robust and do not contain that amount of nodata. Cheers, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Dear all,
I am working on a TSA product (2000-2020) and want to create a CAT Analysis utilising SPLITS over some indices (NDVI, kNDVI, TC-B, TC-W, TC-G, TC-D) in an LSP analysis (Peak of Season). Most data is processed perfectly (NDVI, kNDVI, TC-G), but there are timesteps in the LSP file looking some kind of corrupted, for example, 2018. I am using Landsat 4,5,8 and Sentinel-2A/B data which are processed, resolution merged and co-registrated in the level-2 processing step.
TC-Green 2018:
TC-Bright 2018:
TC-Wet 2018:
TC-Disturbance 2018:
There is no logical explanation for these fragments as far as I can see; the years before and after look totaly usual (like the TC-Green) and other values are processed good the same year too like the NDVI or TC-Green.
The sensors used for the calculation don't change in FORCE from TC to TC.
Here my PRM-file:
TSA_2000-2020.txt
I changed the interpolation method, changed the indices to singel processing not all in one, another period (2015-2020), another resolution (30m and 10m). The data as I can see looks totaly normal to me, as the other indices are processed normal. I couldn't fix the issue for a long time now and running out of ideas.
I hope someone has another idea to help me out. If you need some more information on this, I would make them available.
Best
Paul
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions