You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I hope this message finds you well. I have been reviewing the configuration file for the project, and I noticed that the values for VOCAB_SIZE and OBJ_CLASSES_SIZE are set to 206 and 155, respectively. I would like to inquire about how these specific values were determined.
I have also looked into the content of the COCO.vocab, which provides mappings between object and predicate names and their corresponding indices. Based on my understanding, for the model to predict classes accurately, OBJ_CLASSES_SIZE should be equal to either object_name_to_idx or object_idx_to_name, but it seems that 155 does not match any of these values.
Could you kindly provide some insights into the rationale behind choosing the values 206 and 155 for VOCAB_SIZE and OBJ_CLASSES_SIZE? I am curious to understand the reasoning behind these numbers.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I hope this message finds you well. I have been reviewing the configuration file for the project, and I noticed that the values for VOCAB_SIZE and OBJ_CLASSES_SIZE are set to 206 and 155, respectively. I would like to inquire about how these specific values were determined.
I have also looked into the content of the COCO.vocab, which provides mappings between object and predicate names and their corresponding indices. Based on my understanding, for the model to predict classes accurately, OBJ_CLASSES_SIZE should be equal to either object_name_to_idx or object_idx_to_name, but it seems that 155 does not match any of these values.
Could you kindly provide some insights into the rationale behind choosing the values 206 and 155 for VOCAB_SIZE and OBJ_CLASSES_SIZE? I am curious to understand the reasoning behind these numbers.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: