You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Was brainstorming on how to improve the firmware and figured I'd make a suggestion for an idea for automatic bed leveling, without probe.
Of course, I will work on this on my own branch and ensure it is properly tested - but I'd like your feedback on it. I'd like to hear whether you think my idea is feasible or if it's been tried and disregarded. My printer is currently out-of-operation (bad hotend), so I will start work on this in a week or so. Now for the meat of this feature request...
What's the idea?
The idea revolves around detecting physical contact between the nozzle and the heated bed. If the nozzle is in direct contact, it can be assumed that it's not calibrated correctly for said coordinate. To detect contact between the two parts, I want to find out whether we can detect temperature transfer from the nozzle to the bed. Since the bed is a large heat sponge, the fluctuations could be really small - or it would take a substantial time to detect any heat. I want to investigate whether this is a feasible way of detecting contact. Once contact is detected, the hot-end can be gradually raised until the bed temperature shows no fluctuations in temperature. Ambient heat transfer is something to keep in mind, but to find out whether that'll have serious impacts will have to wait until I can test again.
Why is this useful?
It would introduce a practically universal method of auto bed leveling - without use of external equipment. Though the current manual bed leveling is a great addition, having a stable automatic process would allow for more consistency in calibration.
Questions for the community:
Has this been tried before? What were the results of that experiment?
Perhaps it may actually be better to detect fluctuations in the nozzle temperature from bed heating, what do you think?
Any suggestions for things to keep in mind?
Thanks again for all your work on the project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Detecting heat transfer from bed to nozzle seems to be the way to go. When the bed is heated to 80 degrees, you can see a noticeable temperature delta ranging from 5 to 8 degrees Celcius depending on how long you let it settle. It takes about 3 minutes to settle, bringing my hot-end from ambient 25 to 33 degrees Celcius.
Problems arise when calibrating. Performing a manual leveling test (with receipt paper) produces a suitable gap. However, a lot of ambient heat transfers to the nozzle - making it impossible to detect. I'll give this some more research later, with different bed temperatures.
If I ever figure out a working solution, I'll add a pull request for it.
(Either way, this form of automatic leveling would be very slow)
Hi there,
Was brainstorming on how to improve the firmware and figured I'd make a suggestion for an idea for automatic bed leveling, without probe.
Of course, I will work on this on my own branch and ensure it is properly tested - but I'd like your feedback on it. I'd like to hear whether you think my idea is feasible or if it's been tried and disregarded. My printer is currently out-of-operation (bad hotend), so I will start work on this in a week or so. Now for the meat of this feature request...
What's the idea?
The idea revolves around detecting physical contact between the nozzle and the heated bed. If the nozzle is in direct contact, it can be assumed that it's not calibrated correctly for said coordinate. To detect contact between the two parts, I want to find out whether we can detect temperature transfer from the nozzle to the bed. Since the bed is a large heat sponge, the fluctuations could be really small - or it would take a substantial time to detect any heat. I want to investigate whether this is a feasible way of detecting contact. Once contact is detected, the hot-end can be gradually raised until the bed temperature shows no fluctuations in temperature. Ambient heat transfer is something to keep in mind, but to find out whether that'll have serious impacts will have to wait until I can test again.
Why is this useful?
It would introduce a practically universal method of auto bed leveling - without use of external equipment. Though the current manual bed leveling is a great addition, having a stable automatic process would allow for more consistency in calibration.
Questions for the community:
Thanks again for all your work on the project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: