You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have searched the existing issues, and I could not find an existing issue for this feature
I am requesting a straightforward extension of existing dbt functionality, rather than a Big Idea better suited to a discussion
Describe the feature
dbt-cloud is adding support to allow users to define private packages in their dependencies.yml or packages.yml. The format will be similar to git package definition except that the git field will be the private field and an additional optional provider field. Example:
packages:
- private: dbt-labs/my-awesome-repo
# optional configs - same as for 'git' packages
revision: ... # tag, release, branch, or commit SHA
subdirectory: ...
provider: github (if there are multiple providers)
In dbt-core, when such a package is defined, we should provide clear error message and tell user to use git definition.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Who will this benefit?
No response
Are you interested in contributing this feature?
No response
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is this your first time submitting a feature request?
Describe the feature
dbt-cloud is adding support to allow users to define private packages in their
dependencies.yml
orpackages.yml
. The format will be similar to git package definition except that thegit
field will be theprivate
field and an additional optional provider field. Example:In dbt-core, when such a package is defined, we should provide clear error message and tell user to use git definition.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Who will this benefit?
No response
Are you interested in contributing this feature?
No response
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: