Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CT-1212] [Feature] Cross-database macro for type_boolean() #470

Closed
3 tasks done
jpmmcneill opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #471
Closed
3 tasks done

[CT-1212] [Feature] Cross-database macro for type_boolean() #470

jpmmcneill opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #471
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help_wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@jpmmcneill
Copy link
Contributor

Is this your first time submitting a feature request?

  • I have read the expectations for open source contributors
  • I have searched the existing issues, and I could not find an existing issue for this feature
  • I am requesting a straightforward extension of existing dbt-spark functionality, rather than a Big Idea better suited to a discussion

Describe the feature

see dbt-labs/dbt-core#5739

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Who will this benefit?

No response

Are you interested in contributing this feature?

No response

Anything else?

No response

@jpmmcneill jpmmcneill added enhancement New feature or request triage labels Sep 19, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title [Feature] Cross-database macro for type_boolean() [CT-1212] [Feature] Cross-database macro for type_boolean() Sep 19, 2022
@jtcohen6 jtcohen6 added good_first_issue Good for newcomers help_wanted Extra attention is needed and removed triage good_first_issue Good for newcomers labels Sep 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help_wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants