Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CT-1929] [Bug] dependency conflict with databricks #606

Closed
2 tasks done
colin-rogers-dbt opened this issue Jan 26, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
2 tasks done

[CT-1929] [Bug] dependency conflict with databricks #606

colin-rogers-dbt opened this issue Jan 26, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
type:bug Something isn't working

Comments

@colin-rogers-dbt
Copy link
Contributor

Is this a new bug in dbt-spark?

  • I believe this is a new bug in dbt-spark
  • I have searched the existing issues, and I could not find an existing issue for this bug

Current Behavior

databricks-sql-connector requires thrift==0.16.0

Expected Behavior

dependencies don't conflict

Steps To Reproduce

install

Relevant log output

The conflict is caused by:
    dbt-spark[pyhive] 1.4.0 depends on thrift<0.16.0 and >=0.11.0; extra == "pyhive"
    databricks-sql-connector 2.3.0 depends on thrift<0.17.0 and >=0.16.0
    dbt-spark[pyhive] 1.4.0 depends on thrift<0.16.0 and >=0.11.0; extra == "pyhive"
    databricks-sql-connector 2.2.2 depends on thrift<0.17.0 and >=0.16.0

Environment

- OS:
- Python:
- dbt-core:
- dbt-spark:

Additional Context

No response

@colin-rogers-dbt colin-rogers-dbt added type:bug Something isn't working triage:product labels Jan 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title [Bug] dependency conflict with databricks [CT-1929] [Bug] dependency conflict with databricks Jan 26, 2023
@jtcohen6
Copy link
Contributor

jtcohen6 commented Feb 3, 2023

resolved by #605

@jtcohen6 jtcohen6 closed this as completed Feb 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants