Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add type_{X} macros to listing of cross-database macros #1644

Closed
1 task done
dbeatty10 opened this issue Jun 30, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1648
Closed
1 task done

Add type_{X} macros to listing of cross-database macros #1644

dbeatty10 opened this issue Jun 30, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1648
Assignees
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content dbt-core v1.2 Docs impact for the v1.2 release (July 2022) improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear

Comments

@dbeatty10
Copy link
Contributor

Contributions

  • I have read the contribution docs, and understand what's expected of me.

Link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates

https://docs.getdbt.com/reference/dbt-jinja-functions/cross-database-macros

What part(s) of the page would you like to see updated?

dbt-labs/dbt-core#5428 and dbt-labs/dbt-utils#586 move type_{X} macros from dbt-utils into dbt-core.

We want to create an entry for each containing:

  • Arguments
  • Usage
  • Sample Output (PostgreSQL)

Additional information

No response

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear labels Jun 30, 2022
@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 self-assigned this Jun 30, 2022
@jtcohen6 jtcohen6 added the dbt-core v1.2 Docs impact for the v1.2 release (July 2022) label Jun 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content dbt-core v1.2 Docs impact for the v1.2 release (July 2022) improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants