Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review code example for saved-queries in dbt_project.yml #6066

Closed
1 task done
dbeatty10 opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

Review code example for saved-queries in dbt_project.yml #6066

dbeatty10 opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear

Comments

@dbeatty10
Copy link
Contributor

Contributions

  • I have read the contribution docs, and understand what's expected of me.

Link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates

https://docs.getdbt.com/reference/dbt_project.yml#naming-convention

What part(s) of the page would you like to see updated?

I didn't test it out one way or the other, but this code example doesn't look right to me:

image

Rather, I'd expect it to look like this example:

image

So something more like:

saved-queries:  # Use dashes for resource types in the dbt_project.yml file.
  my_project_name:
    +cache:
      enabled: true

Additional information

No response

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear labels Sep 13, 2024
@mirnawong1
Copy link
Contributor

asked @QMalcolm for confirmation and will make changes once confirmed

@mirnawong1
Copy link
Contributor

accidentally committed to current but this is fixed in this code commit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants