Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delta backups done against full rather than incrementals #70

Open
rdelcorro opened this issue Mar 21, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Delta backups done against full rather than incrementals #70

rdelcorro opened this issue Mar 21, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@rdelcorro
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ddebeau I am seeing in my aws console that the incrementals created are based on the full rather than on previews incremental.

image

If you look at my backups, they are getting bigger and bigger duplicating a lot of data. I can't create a new full as it needs to be stored for 6 months due to deep archive constraints. I am open to create a PR to solve this but I wanted your opinion on the subject.

This affects:

  • Backups: They need to look into the latest incremental and use that as a base
  • Restores: They need to restore the full and all the chain of incrementals up to the point where the user specifies in time

The savings would be massive across time

Thanks

@ddebeau
Copy link
Owner

ddebeau commented Mar 21, 2023

I would support a PR that adds true incremental backup support. The backup object should support it. Just the backup and restore logic would need to be changed.

The feature would be a pretty big undertaking. Let me know if you have any questions or run into any issues creating new tests!

@rdelcorro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Finally I completed this work! PR: #75

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants